Candace Owens covers the UVU independent review, a whistleblower death, and ongoing narrative warfare
Candace Owens hosts a solo episode of her podcast.
Summary
A satirical takedown of the latest fabricated narrative about illegal immigrants allegedly housed in a mansion opens the episode, before pivoting to a serious argument about how coordinated media distractions are being deployed to pull public attention away from the UVU independent review into Charlie Kirk's death. A specific unanswered question from that review is identified: the identity of a fire captain from Station 2 who reportedly performed CPR on Charlie Kirk at the hospital, a detail conspicuously absent from both Frank Turek's and Brian Harpole's accounts. The episode also covers the death of Simon Andre, a British banker and former managing director at BGC Group who had flagged Howard Lutnick's alleged ties to Jeffrey Epstein — including a 2018 email chain about a joint startup and claims that Lutnick had visited Epstein's island — and died by apparent suicide. The episode also addresses what Owens characterizes as a coordinated psychological operation pushing a false "epidemic of mothers killing children" narrative, announces that Baron Coleman will be taking over her show (and is already being subjected to smear attempts), and closes with commentary on Zach Bryan breaking an attendance record at Gillette Stadium while wearing a Free Palestine shirt.
Key Takeaways
FULL TRANSCRIPT
Opening: The "Candyland" Narrative Series Continues
Candace Owens: All right, you guys. Happy Monday. A lot to unpack. It's been a fantastic weekend if you are on the side of humanity and goodness. Terrible weekend if you secretly worship Baal. I will say that right now. The Epstein class is down real bad right now. Another mysterious death connected to the Epstein files. Also, you have country singer Zach Bryan shattering the attendance record at Gillette Stadium while wearing a Free Palestine shirt. Just a lot going on. We're going to unpack all of that. But first, I want to let you guys know that there is a PSYOP taking place that you may not be aware of. I need to draw your attention to it — one that is meant to distract you from the UVU independent review. And the Epstein files — all of it — you probably didn't even recognize that it was taking place. We are still talking about it. Trump, unfortunately. So welcome back to Candace.
Okay, good news, you guys. After a week of living as a committed lesbian, the narrative has once again shifted regarding Candace Owens. The Candace fantasy series moves forward. It must always move forward onto something else. This time I regret to inform you that I am operating a mansion that is apparently filled with smuggled illegals. I'm forcing them to work for me under duress and under NDA. Here are the themes from this week.
This is a real tweet from Lisa Nose. It reads: "It's not just the NDAs that are a problem. It's so much darker. Candace is rumored to have two nannies for each child. That's currently eight nannies in total, and she has them all living in the mansion down the street from her own mansion. Remember the second mansion that Laura Loomer's reported on? It's been reported that she hires nannies who are in the country illegally so that she can threaten and intimidate them with deportation. And she underpays them so that they can't get ahead and they're stuck with her. Ironically, she sources her nannies from an elite Jewish nanny agency. This is serious. These women are absolutely terrified of her and for good reason. It's rumored that she treats them terribly and they have all signed NDAs and they legally cannot speak out. This was originally reported on by Jessica Reed Krauss of House in Habit. I independently confirmed this information via three individuals who separately know Candace."
I'm just getting worse every week, you guys. I am — ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement — nope. Nothing will be enforced. This is how I live. I don't know what to tell you guys. This might be the greatest Candace conspiracy of all time. It's my favorite without question. All right, maybe second only to me paying off someone less than $5,000 after my husband hit them in a DUI accident. I just want you guys to know that I run these streets in Nashville. I am the Tennessee mafia, the kingpin, the godmother. People fear me. I am all of the things.
Now, some of you guys might be wondering practically — why is the elite Jewish nanny agency giving Candace illegals to hoard in a mansion? Why is Candace putting them in a mansion? If she's underpaying them, why not keep them somewhere cheaper? And the answer is because everybody fears me. The Jewish elite nanny agency and the illegals. I am the Scarface of Nashville. I haven't actually seen that movie, by the way, but it sounds scary. Scarface — that's me.
Stepping away from the Candace fantasy series, which I think I'm going to start referring to as Candyland — I like that. What's happening in Candyland today?
The Fake News Geyser: How Narratives Are Manufactured to Bury Real Stories
You may have noticed that there appears to be a very intense and ever-intentional push of certain stories and narratives right now. They're fundamentally untrue, just like that one. But it's more than ever before. It feels almost as if I'm not even sure the internet is real. I'm actually starting to believe in the dead internet theory — like it's just all bots that we're engaging with. Maybe a better way to state it is that on the internet, time is speeding up. They're just cycling through narratives, hoping that something sticks. What used to be a steady stream of propaganda has now turned into a fire hydrant over the last year. The fake news geyser.
And one of the things we have to consider is why this is happening. The why. I have a theory and I want to share it with you guys, and I want you to take this very seriously because it's important. I thought about this all weekend.
For years, it's obvious that the media has been working with the state — in conjunction with the state — at least since the JFK assassination. They have functioned under a very distinct and manageable formula. Even the biggest stories — stories that should be huge — when the state decides to tell the media to make us forget about it, we do. Whatever the story is, they can force it to crash on the shore of societal ADHD. It's like everyone goes, "Oh, moving on, something else." The media has definitely been capable of making us just focus somewhere else.
The clearest example of that is the mass shooting which occurred in Las Vegas in 2017. Biggest mass shooting in American history. It resulted in 60 deaths and 869 documented injuries. Investigators claimed that they recovered 24 firearms from a man named Steven Paddock's hotel suite and another firearm from his vehicle. They claimed that he acted entirely alone. And what did Steven claim? Well, nothing, because the 64-year-old alleged gunman died by suicide before police entered his hotel room. Ultimately, investigators and analysts over at the FBI concluded in 2019 that they actually couldn't determine a motive. They couldn't determine, and they said, quote, "a single or clear motivating factor behind the attack." It's just effectively unresolved — because it's BS. The whole story is BS. Obviously, what we were told makes entirely no sense.
Now, the conspiracies — which in my view have a lot more evidentiary support — the conspiracy theorists were surmising that it was actually a military operation which involved Israel and Saudi Arabia. You can go down that rabbit hole in your own time. We're not going to focus on that today. Ian Carroll has actually done a lot of great work with that, as have many others. The point I'm driving home is that they disappeared it from the media cycle in less than a week. How did they do that? Well, because five days later, they just broke a bigger story — a more distracting story at least — and that was #MeToo. The New York Times, the big story on Harvey Weinstein. They took him out. It was a Hollywood story for the ages. Allegations of sexual impropriety, rape pertaining to A-listers, people who are supposed to be untouchable. Wall-to-wall coverage everywhere. Every day a new Hollywood name got dropped. The names got bigger and bigger. Gwyneth Paltrow, you name it. Paris Hilton, everyone was impacted. Everyone famous was forced to make a statement or to share a story about how they had been personally victimized by Harvey Weinstein. And that was literally all it took — a Hollywood production — and then within five days nobody was speaking about the Las Vegas shooting, which appeared to be a CIA/Mossad operation.
Now, fast forward to today — fast forward to Charlie's assassination. When that took place, they attempted to follow that same pattern. I remember, as just one example, a couple of weeks later they were trying to force-feed the Somali daycare scandal in Minneapolis. Like suddenly welfare is being abused — like it hasn't been since the very beginning, like it wasn't actually structured to be abused. But this was getting a lot of play time. Coincidentally, the brave journalist who had uncovered this welfare scandal in Minneapolis, Nick Shirley — who also, you know, goes to Brazil, I'm not going to get into it — he was relatively unknown to the public. He was doing some other work, but he also happened to be the very last guest on the Charlie Kirk show, picked by Andrew Kolvet, who runs Charlie's Twitter account. And Nick probably doesn't know that. They said, "Hey, come on Charlie's show," and he did that. But it turns out, despite their best push, the welfare abuse Somali scandal was not big enough to make us move on. And now we're a year — over a year — into this. And it seems that they can't manufacture a story that's big enough to make the world move on from Charlie Kirk. The story has only grown. The interest has only grown. More people are now investigating and contributing to trying to uncover exactly what took place on September 10th.
The "Epidemic of Killer Mothers" PSYOP
Now you might be noticing as of late that there's another intentional push — actually a very bizarre narrative. Frankly, the setup of this reminds me of BLM. They're holding a magnifying glass to one incident and then attempting to convince the public that we're facing an epidemic that must be dealt with. It started with the Lindsey Clancy case. I was very open and honest regarding the fact that I did not follow the case, that I had made statements years earlier when it had just broken in the news about pharmaceuticals, first-degree versus second-degree murder, doctors need to be arrested if all of these drugs are true. I didn't follow the case because I just sensed that it was intentionally being pushed through the algorithm and they wanted people to make statements on it.
Suddenly TikTok keeps sharing these videos of extreme women. They find the crazies, and these women are saying that they're displaying acts of empathy toward Lindsey Clancy. They're throwing dolls at walls or down the staircase and saying that this is how they feel as stay-at-home mothers. And suddenly conservatives are pretending that this is an accurate depiction of all mothers in America right now. There's a problem, broadly speaking — there's a problem with women on the internet in general. Women are being impacted by a social contagion. And if it's not dealt with soon, well, we're all going to just want to kill our children in solidarity with Lindsey Clancy. It's absurd. But this is what neocons began pushing — radical calls for women to get off TikTok. "If your wife's on TikTok, she needs to be off TikTok." As if in the land before TikTok you couldn't find these crazies too. I mean, people were writing letters to Ted Bundy wanting to marry the guy. I think he probably did end up getting married in prison or something. This is not a new phenomenon. This is not because of TikTok. There's always going to be crazies even when there's no technology.
But this is what they were pushing. The problem is that females just don't know how to internet. We need guardrails, really. And then they made the mistake of revealing their hand. They kind of strained and said, "And these are the same women who don't like Erika Kirk and think that she has something to do with the death of her husband." This is the problem. It's the obsession with true crime wine moms at home listening to Candace Owens. They can't see how perfect and godly Erika is because the internet has created this social contagion. The problem is not that Erika keeps getting caught in lie after lie. The problem is not that she's unconvincing, that her grief is unconvincing. The problem is that women are interneting.
And just like that — I said you'd recognize these as the signs of a PSYOP. It's the cheapest form of politicking, by the way. Pretending, taking a magnifying glass to something really small, being like, "Told you." But I want you to check out this objectively hilarious clip of Rep. Nancy Mace, who has accepted over six figures from AIPAC and cannot utter a single bad word about Israel. She's been chief among the people in politics pushing this absurd narrative. Take a listen.
Nancy Mace: I just don't know why all these moms are trying to kill their kids. I don't know what's going on. I just — to me, as a mom of two kids — I can't even imagine. This is beyond postpartum psychosis, beyond postpartum depression. I don't know what this culture is that this is what's happening. Why are moms killing their kids?
Candace Owens: Why? I can't even call a friend. I can't call my sister. Everybody's just doing this. It's an epidemic. Every time you call a friend, I'm like, "Hey, do you want to hang out?" They're like, "No, I have plans to kill my kids tonight." What? What are we talking about?
If I didn't know any better, on the basis of just how much she keeps tweeting about this, I would reckon that somebody's asking her to put out this narrative. These are real tweets from Nancy Mace. I'm not going to read all of them in their entirety, but you've got this tweet — "the epidemic of the killer mother." At some point, this cannot be considered a coincidence. Then she starts talking about this Christopher Petray person and shares a story from the New York Post. "Why is the news covering for mother murderers? Stop calling her a homeowner. Call her what she is. She was their mother and is charged with killing her kids." That person just seems like the standard mom that you meet. Next one: "Vivien was four years old. A judge ruled that she was going home to her dad and she never made it there." Again, shared by the New York Post. Next one: "Not only did she stab her kids 50 times, but she took a baseball bat to them. Also, perhaps the South Carolina legislature could make an exception to the death penalty by firing squad. We ain't got no time for this. Send her to hell."
And of course, this is being echoed by Libs of TikTok, another committed Israel operative. No question. She's been flooding the zone with these stories and trying to create mass panic. She wrote: "Meet Tanisha Lache Jones, who was arrested and charged in South Carolina with homicide after her infant daughter was found dead with lethal amounts of morphine in her system. Are Lindsey Clancy fans going to support her, too?"
I call my friends like, "Do you guys want to hang out?" They're like, "No, I'm going to give my child a dose of morphine tonight." What?
And speaking of TikTok — that seems to be the breeding ground. A lot of this unhinged narrative is being pushed through the algorithm. We all know Israel took over TikTok. That was done right in our face. It became too pro-Palestine after October 7th. So they said, "We're going to get rid of it because China controls it." And then they said, "Never mind — we've got this group of Zionist investors and we're just going to buy it and get rid of pro-Palestine talk." That seems to have backfired a little bit.
So yeah, it makes sense that TikTok is pushing this, but also the New York Post in particular — the Mossad's rag, the one that had everything to do with Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, discovering he had been suicided in his cell, covering for Ghislaine Maxwell, she's just poor Ghislaine — suddenly they are very focused on this beat. Take a look at these headlines from the New York Post. Recent ones. You just type it in: Texas mother, South Carolina mom, South Carolina mother, Texas mom — sharing story after story of women killing their children. That's how you know it's a psychological operation.
And beyond that, you know it's a psychological operation — a PSYOP — because it has no basis in statistical reality. That's the crucial element you're looking for. Does it have any basis in statistical reality? If the answer is no, welcome to a PSYOP.
The Real Statistics on Filicide
So let me tell you the real facts about this. Filicide — that means a parent murders their own child — is exceedingly rare. How rare? In the United States, which is a nation of 350 million people, there are approximately 500 cases per year which count as filicide. And 10% of those cases are actually being committed by a stepparent or another guardian. So if you remove non-biological parents, you're down to just 450 cases of filicide per year. That works out to 0.0000129% of the population that is committing this heinous act. That works out to one case per every 770,000 people.
Another fact is that the majority of these murders — and this is according to NIH statistics — are being committed by fathers. Fathers represent 57% of the offenders, whereas mothers represent just 43% of the offenders. Now, I saw some people arguing, "Well, women are more likely to do it if it's an infant." Is that better? Like, once you're six and you are walking and talking, it's different? Men are more likely to kill the child if the child is over five years old. Women are more likely to kill the child if the child is beneath the age of five. Men are more likely to kill the entire household and his entire bloodline over a divorce settlement. And to be clear, I'm not saying that to pit women versus men. This is not an epidemic either way, because again, it is exceedingly rare. I'm only demonstrating to you how a PSYOP functions. It is the opposite of reality that is being pressed upon you.
Now, despite statistical reality, the neocons are very focused on trying to make you think it's an epidemic. So we have to ask ourselves why. Why does it appear that the same people who are radically pro-Israel, who were overwhelmed by the virtually non-existent evidence pointing to Tyler Robinson's guilt, the same people who will not touch or cover the UVU independent review, the same people who were not at all curious about Charlie having abandoned the pro-life cause shortly before his death — why is it that all of the people who hit these markers are also pushing this non-reality upon the public?
I can give you my honest opinion. My honest opinion is that it's because ultimately they are going to seek to regulate the internet because of the failure — the astonishing failure — of the Pentagon to cover their own tracks regarding the assassination of Charlie. And who do they blame for that failure? Well, women, because they were the first to not believe or accept Erika's performance based on their gut instincts, not knowing anything about her. They just said something doesn't feel right. That was the left and the right in unison. People sensed something was off almost immediately with the widow, the administration, and also the fireworks. Just everything kept adding up. And then they blame me, of course, another woman, because I vindicated their suspicions with actual proof — showing audiences that yes, something is wrong with this case, something is wrong with the story. Here are the discrepancies in the narrative. Here's the timeline. Here are the photos of the car that he was transported in to the hospital. Here is what I know about what was done differently because I toured with Charlie. Here are never-before-seen videos and pictures.
And so they've attacked me. They attacked my family relentlessly over this, non-stop, moving from one extreme narrative to the next, hoping that the next one will catch because it's just so crazy. Now I'm hoarding illegals in mansions. It just sounds like somebody watched Narcos. And despite their weekly attempts to destroy my character, the public's not biting, which means that the Department of War controlling our algorithm and launching an infinite amount of bots is not working. It's proven ineffectual. So they're now moving toward an attempt to regulate the internet itself. That's my opinion, and you need to be conscious of that. They are completely shaken by what is a new predicament for them. They've had unlimited power. And now the state is suddenly losing to truth. And more crucially, they're losing to independent podcasters. We're nobodies. We're supposed to be nobodies. Independent podcasters who simply will not quit in the pursuit of truth.
In a medical sense, the best way to describe it is we've become resistant to our state-mandated antibiotics. And they're like, "We're doing millions of bots. We're paying tons of money. The stories are getting crazier. No one's biting." And as their stories and their narratives become more extreme, what I think we need to do is to process that, recognize why it's happening, and do our best to not take the bait and to remain focused.
The UVU Independent Review: The Unnamed Fire Captain
Last week, they went insane again. The reason they went insane is because of the release of UVU's independent review. That much is obvious to me, because there is a truth embedded within this report that needs to be further explored. I think it pertains to the question of CPR. The CPR question is a point of impossible contention.
First, we had Frank Turek who said he did CPR — he administered it from the back seat, jumped over from the back seat while Brian Harpole was driving, during the last 30 seconds of the ride. Brian Harpole said that CPR actually was not administered in the car or anywhere else, for that matter, because Brian's story carries us beyond the car ride — right through to the hospital. He grabs a gurney. He hops on top of that gurney. He cuts off Charlie's shirt. He's prepping Charlie for a defibrillator before talking through the medications that Charlie is going to need. He sees himself out. He guards the door. He told us a long story of what took place during his time. We are to assume that Frank was FaceTiming Jack Hibbs on the basis of the story that they both told — how quickly that took place. Mikey called.
But there is a major problem, you guys. A major problem when I combine these two stories, which are running in conflict with one another. Nowhere in Brian's or Frank's extraordinary recounting of what happened on that day did either of them feature a fire captain who met them at the hospital and began performing CPR on Charlie. That is an unbelievable oversight. Unbelievable — as in I don't believe it. How could they both forget that? Two of them forgetting that detail registers to me as impossible.
So, ladies and gentlemen, there is a fire captain that isn't barking. This person was either the most forgettable human in the entire world, walks around like a ghost, or he is a highly important individual worthy of identifying because he might unlock some other narrative questions. I found it curious that the UVU independent review declined to name him. It was a curious omission for a couple of reasons. Foremost, because he's a public figure. A fire captain is a public figure. And a public figure who played a crucial role in a public event doesn't just get to say, "I don't want to be named, please keep my privacy." That's not an option. You're a public figure. Also, the review chose to name people who didn't even want to participate in the review at all. They named Caleb Chilkit, the Turning Point USA local chapter president at UVU. They named Macy Crofts over at headquarters. They didn't care. So we need to determine who this fire captain is and why he was left off the report.
First, I want to remind ourselves of what the review stated. And please, you guys — I'm just going to say now, do not inundate us with Google searches. It makes me sad. It breaks my heart as someone who loves to research to see that so many people are just asking AI questions. We don't want AI answers. We can AI ourselves. Do not give your thinking over to an AI program. AI is just scraping the internet with answers that are on the internet. It is not actually telling you anything. And if you give it five minutes, it'll tell you something else.
But first, to jog memory of what the UVU review told us about this individual. It reads, quote: "Fire personnel from Station 1 and Station 3 were initially dispatched to the scene of the shooting. Personnel from Stations 2 and 4 also responded because the extent of medical need was not yet known. While en route, the Station 3 fire truck passed near the SUV being used by the TPUSA security team to transport Charlie Kirk to Timpanogos Hospital. Station 3 personnel provided that information over the radio. Station 2 then rerouted to Timpanogos Hospital, where the fire captain from Station 2 assisted in providing CPR to Charlie Kirk at the hospital."
So we know it's a fire captain from Station 2. So we began researching, going through the dispatch calls, and we can now allow you guys to listen to what seems to us to be corroborating evidence — the corroborative 911 sequence. We are going to learn in this call that it was Ladder 33 and Engine 34 that were redirected toward Timpanogos. And for clarity, if you're like me and you don't really know anything about fire trucks — the engine is what's going to carry the water, that's going to be the hose if there is a fire. And of course they're going to dispatch this stuff just as part of protocol. There's no fire at Timpanogos, but they would send one. And the ladder carries the ladder and other rescue equipment. So someone's going to be rescuing people from the building while the other is fighting the fire.
So you're about to hear that they are sending Ladder 33 and Engine 34. It's very quick. Take a listen.
Dispatch: Ladder 33, Engine 34, we're in the area. We'll head towards camp.
Candace Owens: Okay, that dispatch came in at around 12:30 p.m. That's what we can see, and it looks like it is coming from Provo. But I wanted you to hear it. And we were also able to narrow it down because in the lead-up to that dispatch, they discussed Charlie's vehicle and his feet hanging out from it, just as is described in the UVU report. Take a listen to that dispatch communication about Charlie's vehicle.
Dispatch: I'm going to need one other with me at Timpanogos Hospital, please. Copy. We're trying to get further details on a location. It looks like 3J was possibly 1080 on a vehicle northbound 580 South Wolverine Way, the black SUV. There was possibly another victim — one hanging out of the vehicle. From 33. Yes, please. We're trying to get a good channel for responding units as well. We just got signals by PD to follow them. Were they following a victim to the hospital? Copy. Switching to 3J. We got officers en route to the hospital to be with the victim.
Candace Owens: So, just to be clear, obviously there's a lot of static and you're looking at subtitles — they're guessing sometimes. So where it says "Nigel from Ladder 33," maybe saying something that sounds like "Nigel, Ladder 33" — take that with a grain of salt. But we do know that it was Ladder 33 that was sent there. And of course we have the UVU report informing us that it was a captain.
Again, I know that you can research and you can find captains that were working at that time. There are like two of them that keep coming up in the mix. We are looking for inside information. We do not want to be hit with AI searches or probability guesses. This feels significant enough that we need a concrete answer as to who performed CPR — who met Charlie's SUV at the hospital and performed CPR — and then gave amnesia to Frank Turek and Brian Harpole about this act. Because that's what happened. They both suddenly descended into amnesia. One remembers CPR in the last 30 seconds of the car ride, but neither of them remembers a fire captain who gave CPR to Charlie at the hospital. I find that to be unbelievable. I do not accept that. I do not believe that. And it is suspicious to me that this person is not named in the report whereas everybody else seems to be named.
So please email us at moretips@candaceowens.com if you know the answer to who the fire captain was that provided CPR to Charlie — who might have been with Ladder 33. And yes, for those of you who are going to email me about some of the conspiracies regarding a different fire captain who perished with his entire family in a flash flood — I am aware of that information. I have not seen any information attaching him necessarily to this particular story. Yes, though, I do know that he did work with Provo EMS. Some of these calls appear to be coming from Provo EMS, but that is not concrete proof of any wider conspiracy. We just want to get the concrete proof of who the fire captain was who conducted CPR.
Frank Turek's Continued Contradictions
We can all obviously read the UVU independent review with our eyes. We can comprehend what's happening within that review. And one of the things you walk away with is how despicable it is that Turning Point has been trying to shift the narrative to blame Chief Jeff Long for the absence of what they deem to be acceptable security — when Charlie's security team, which was made up of about 13 members, all former SEALs with long military records, did virtually nothing. I mean, didn't even try to get in touch with the police. The police had to play offense on that. And then of course we learned that headquarters was not sharing the ticket count, so there's no way they could have prepped without even knowing the numbers sufficiently.
Anyway, Frank Turek went on Brandon Tatum's podcast and gave an interview. He's been speaking way too much. And there's one very funny part of his entire spiel, which is just him forgetting his little spell of amnesia in the middle of it. He's going to go through very quickly about what happened at the hospital, but he is going to recount an interaction that he had with Jeff Long when he returned to UVU. And apparently Chief Long was very upset. He expressed to him how upset he was with the fact that they were lying on him, just blatantly defaming this man and not telling the truth about how they contributed to this security nightmare. Anyway, take a listen to Frank Turek recounting his interaction with Jeff Long.
Frank Turek: So I went back to UVU in March of 2026 — so this is what, six, seven months after the murder — to give a presentation. And students showed up, and after the presentation was over, they all left the room and it was just me and my security team packing up the computer, the final things before we had to go. And Jeff Long, who was the head of the police there at UVU, the chief of police, he comes up to me — comes up kind of from behind me — and he sticks his hand out to shake my hand. And he goes, "Hi, I'm Jeff Long. I'm the chief of police here at UVU. I take a bullet for Charlie. I take a bullet for you. I kind of think I got thrown under the bus today." I said, "What do you mean you got thrown under the bus today?" He said, "You said during your presentation that we had the roofs." I said, "You did have the roofs. I saw the text." Dan Flood, who was on the security team with Charlie — when we got to the hospital, he showed me the text — actually showed it to me a couple of days after that, but he showed me the text that said that I need somebody on the roofs and you texted back, "I got you covered." And then Long said, after I said that, he said, "Well, Charlie's team should have gotten here early." I said, "What does that have to do with it?" He said, "Well, they got here the day of. They should have been here the day before." Again, what does that have to do with it? You said you had the roofs. And he said, "Well, it was just the roof above you." What do you mean the roof above you? "Well, that bridge that was above you — that roof above — we had that because we didn't want people throwing stuff down on Charlie." I said, "Are you telling me when you said you had the roofs that you didn't think you had to have the roofs out there where a sniper could be?" And he was just trying to backpedal away from that. And I said, "Look, man, I'm just a guy here. I was in the Navy, but I'm no security expert." And coming into this place, I said, "Charlie, I don't like this place. There's too many buildings." Are you telling me in a post-Butler, PA environment that you didn't think you had to have somebody on the roofs?
Candace Owens: It's just amazing to me. I don't know how people can look at this person and think that — after everything that we have seen, all of the stories running into one another — that he is honest, or that he is at all actually a pastor who cares about the truth whatsoever. How can you look at that man and think that? He can't even tell the truth as he goes. He's like, "We got to the hospital and Dan Flood showed me the messages" — and then he quietly whispers, "Actually, it was a couple days after that." What? How can you be so convinced of a memory and so strong, and then like quietly whisper in your breath that actually that's not the right memory? Let's just move on from that.
And after this report came out, how do you possess the hubris it takes to sit across from somebody and reinforce the same lies that everyone is now aware of? You just assume that people don't read, that you can act. This is the new thing. It's a circus over at Turning Point USA. Whoever can perform the hardest, whoever can cry the hardest, whoever can manipulate — open your Bibles, how dare you question the widow, how dare you not believe this. We don't believe it because we've now read through the report and we understand what happened. They did not communicate to them how many people were going to be there. In fact, they communicated the exact wrong number of who was going to be there. They ignored the suggestion to have this event be indoors so that they could have some sort of control for safety. And he has no statements about how Turning Point could have done something different. He's defaming the police. That is the truest example of defamation. He's not wondering anymore. The report has been released and he's still saying, "You had the roofs." He's recounting, "You had the roofs." Why say that? Why not be honest and tell people, "Yeah, after seeing that report, after reading through it, sure looks like more could have been done that day by our team"?
He's just repeating the talking points in Erika's intent to sue — the Kirk family's intent to sue — which in no way demonstrates or commits to telling the truth or displays any actual events that transpired leading up to this tragedy. No way does it recount any of those steps that were taken or the steps that weren't taken. And that is by design.
The Death of Whistleblower Simon Andre
Anyway, I want to very quickly tell you what is going on with this whistleblower story, because it's crazy what is happening. This was a person who was blowing the whistle on Howard Lutnick. And I will say "allegedly" here — a lot of people, when they are telling the story about Jeffrey Epstein, it just — a lot of suicides happen. And we've had another suicide.
Here is the headline: the banker whistleblower who flagged Howard Lutnick's links to Epstein dies. A former British banker and whistleblower — his name was Simon Andre — he essentially came forward. He was previously a managing director at Wall Street firm BGC Group, where Lutnik, who is now the US Commerce Secretary, was the CEO. And so he's now dead after saying, "Hey, there was some money laundering that was happening." He was also behind the push to notify people that Howard Lutnick had visited Epstein's island, had visited this temple, this underground structure, so to speak.
You're wondering why Trump doesn't want us to have the Epstein files. This could be a reason why. Because earlier on, Howard Lutnick said he had never visited the island, never visited. Then all of a sudden he fell out of his amnesia and he was like, "Oh, I have visited the island. And Jeffrey Epstein wasn't on the record as a sex offender by then." There's no question of who Jeffrey Epstein was. It's amazing to see which people still stood by him despite the fact that he was serving out a sentence down in Palm Beach. He just got right back to his own life, was still handed keys over at Harvard University because he was that important of a player when it came to blackmailing and global trafficking. That's the reality.
And Andre, who is now dead, had previously told the BBC that he had unearthed evidence indicating that Howard Lutnick failed to disclose a business relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. He told the BBC that he had discovered an email chain from 2018 in which Howard Lutnick and Jeffrey Epstein had discussed prospects of a startup business they were both involved in. So again, Jeffrey Epstein — having been found guilty and striking up a deal down in Palm Beach for having sexually abused children — did not stop Howard Lutnick from wanting to work with him. He wanted to start a business with him in 2018. I mean, that's just stunning to me.
This is a story to pay attention to. They are saying that it is a suicide. Obviously, it is a remarkably suspicious suicide. This guy coming forward discussing these things — and we're sensing this kind of seems to be the unraveling of the world. Pam Bondi saying that it would lead to global economic catastrophe if the files were released. Yeah, I bet it would. I bet it would. I bet we'd learn about how the entire system works. Blackmail, people who are doing deals behind the scenes, people who are caught on camera harming children who are then put into positions of power, fake wives, an entire Mossad network — I think — of women who are pretending to love men who are going through MK Ultra programming from the time that they're young. I think they're farming children for certain roles, taking over companies and corporations. I bet that is why it would cause a global economic crash if all the files were released.
And we keep talking about them. That's why Trump wanted us to just turn around and move on. That's why they're engaging in all of these PSYOPs. And no matter what story we cover, there seems to be this nucleus link — the nucleus of everything is Jeffrey Epstein. What did Epstein represent? Global trafficking. And that's why we can't stop talking about it.
Zach Bryan, Free Palestine, and the Good Guys Winning
I will say, for some good news on the flip side, it does seem that the good guys are winning. They just can't do it anymore. They can't go after people for being righteous anymore. They're constantly going after the good guys.
We had covered last week how this Ed Sheeran thing — I said, "This is actually really important." I'm not even a fan of Macklemore. I think he's kind of annoying and obnoxious with every cause that he takes up, but he's been consistent — every time he hits the stage, he's bringing up some cause, every time he has a microphone. Not all of them that I believe in. And so Ed Sheeran knew what he was getting into when he offered for Macklemore — who he has been friends with for a long time — to open for him. And Macklemore did what Macklemore always does. He got on stage, but this time he said "Free Palestine." And an old perve — Robert Kraft — kind of, on a technicality, got a case dropped against him. Whatever. He's not guilty of anything, to be clear. But he then says, "I'm a billionaire and this is how this works. You're canceled. You can't perform. This is my stadium. I own Gillette Stadium. Tough luck. Macklemore's canceled."
God intervenes, and the shows that were scheduled to take place at Gillette Stadium actually got cancelled because of a nor'easter — a weather event. So the next act that was slated to perform was Zach Bryan, and Zach Bryan hits the stage wearing a Free Palestine shirt. Just a perfect response. Free Palestine — just wearing the shirt. And I want to say, to be clear, his entire band were all wearing Free Palestine shirts. The drummer in particular — he was even repping a horrific story that happened to a five-year-old Palestinian girl on the back of his green shirt. This was tremendous.
And the best part of the way that God works — he had two nights, and he wore a Free Palestine shirt both nights. He broke the record — the attendance record at Gillette Stadium — while wearing a Free Palestine shirt for the second night in a row. And the record was previously held by Ed Sheeran. Any comments, Robert Kraft? Any comments?
We're not shutting up about any of this stuff. We are so done listening to wealthy, perverted billionaires — many of them, not Robert Kraft, but many of them are into children. We get that now. This is like a cult. And the more and more people that come out and start doing this sort of stuff, it just lets them know what time it is. And that's why they want to manage the internet. Too much information. We're sending out our bots. It's not working. No matter what we say, people are moral and don't agree with the genocide of children overseas with their taxpaying dollars. How could they? How could they?
Baron Coleman and the Predictable Smear Machine
All weekend — speaking of the good guys constantly being under attack — Baron Coleman, welcome to my life. Since I've announced him as taking over my show, they've now instantly put him into every story every day, digging up 20-year-old interviews of Baron, just trying to make him out to be an abusive guy. It's fantastic. Welcome to my life, Baron. I guess they're trying to get him dropped from taking over my show. We don't care. You guys are all full of it.
Not only is he still going to cover my show, I'm going to give him access to the eight illegal nannies and the mansion — the millionaire mansion — because I got it like that. I'm putting illegals up in mansions down here in Nashville and Baron is going to have access to all of that. What are you going to do? This is my turf. I do what I want.
This trend is so ridiculous: "Baron Coleman faces online criticism before guest spot on Candace Owens." They're getting out there early with the Baron Coleman stories. I can't wait to see what they come up with. Give it a week. They're going to be saying they've hacked his college account and he's gay. It's going to be fantastic. And I'm just going to be on maternity leave. They're still going to be coming after me. I'm certain of it. They'll be cooking up something else. But I will be on maternity leave and I will be laughing at the Baron trends. I might even retweet them. Sorry, Baron. Don't care. It's funny to me. Takes the heat off of me for a few weeks.
Listener Comments
Candace Owens: Top comments from last episode. Bale writes: "It is truly amazing how old body cam footage of minor traffic accidents is way more accessible than major crime scene footage, hospital security footage, etc. Isn't it something?" Yes. Free Brian Cole Jr. — we covered that last week. We're going to keep covering that today because there are some dots that are connecting. They're all kind of connecting in a kind of terrifying way, if we're being honest. Tomorrow, by the way, we're going to get into the economics behind smearing people. Shocking. My producer found an article and I am — of course we knew there was big money in this. Kind of feels like there might have been some Vegas money in going after us. We're going to talk about that tomorrow.
78 Lead Head writes: "As the father of a young man who is autistic, my heart breaks for Brian Cole Jr. and his family. It also enrages me to no end. Anyone with an autistic child knows that you can get them to confess to anything if you put pressure on them. I have accidentally accused my son of things that his brother did and he accepted guilt, only for me to find out the truth later. And I've asked him, 'Son, why did you admit to something that you didn't do?' And he said, 'I don't know.' God bless their hearts. They are very innocent souls."
Yeah. Listening to what he was doing to try to get through it and speaking to himself — it crushes you. It absolutely crushes you. And that is the reality — they're innocent souls. They can be manipulated in those ways. And it's because they're trying to stop what feels to them like something that's really interrupting. That's why they do a lot of the stimming, and they can be sensitive to texture, sensitive to noise. You can only imagine if someone keeps repeating that you did something, what that might do to them. It's despicable. And we should all be rising up against it.
Hey, BLM — I think we got off on the wrong foot. I'm not a supporter of the George Floyd stuff, but I can get behind making some noise over a Brian J. Cole. I'm not talking rioting, of course, but where is the outrage? This is a topic that really actually matters. The feds are blaming something on a Black autistic kid. And tomorrow, we might connect some dots as to why that is happening, because there has been this consistent — how could Kash Patel, Dan Bongino, people talking about how they believed in Dan Bongino so much — what is going on? The Federal Bureau of Investigation has always been corrupt, ladies and gentlemen. You should not be that shocked by that. But tomorrow is going to be a very good show. Do not miss tomorrow.
Zamit writes: "Joan of Arc, Candace, thank you. That is my patron saint. There are all these ties. It all began with France. It all began with Brigitte. And it seems like we are now all on the brink of an awakening of how it all comes together." By the way, I forgot — we also need to talk about the resignation of a data Republican who was literally hired to go after me. Just amazing. The Department of War is like, "We'll just send out someone and make you look like you're a normal person after we tried to use you to destroy Candace."
Stacey Chapman writes: "Elvis had the Memphis mafia and Candace has the Nashville mafia. Don't mess with me." Nobody messes with me. ICE already knows that I'm hoarding all these illegals. I underpay them in cash. The Jewish elite nannying service is scared of me. I have it on lockdown here.
Nato Shady writes: "I admire your search for truth using your voice because Charlie isn't able to. I only wish I could ever say I had a friend as incredible as you are. We have your back. Keep fighting until everything comes to light." Thank you so much. And you know what? Charlie was a good friend to me, and I think that drove them insane. I think it drove them insane. Now that I am able to reflect upon things, these weird narratives they were trying to put out there — one of them being that Charlie unfollowed me. It was a book announcement. I have all of the text messages and receipts about when I unfollowed everybody. Charlie was like, "This is brilliant. Such brilliant marketing." Now they're like, "Charlie and Candace unfollowed each other because they had issues." It's just none of it is true, and that's why none of it sticks. Only what is true can stick. And fortunately we are up against people who cannot tell the truth about anything, even the small things.
Kathy Madson writes: "I stopped watching Jeremy Boring on Heretics to watch this. Christ is king." Oh, that man is just so unwell and only becoming more unwell by the minute. I genuinely can't even engage. I just find him to be just spastic, honestly.
Jason Bourne's Wife writes: "Girl, well done on being a wife, mother, working, as well as being a committed switch hitter and apparently hoarding undocumented humans. It takes a lot. I'm not going to lie. It takes a lot. Well done. I'm not letting these fools get you down. Much love to you." I have them living in a mansion. What more do these illegals want from me?
Tomorrow Robbins writes: "Yes, we are still talking about the Epstein files, DJT, and I think all will tie into the Charlie Kirk assassination." Absolutely. "Go max. That's what we have been doing non-stop. Christ is king indeed. The truth is king. Christ is king."
And you can just feel the energy rising. Everyone is aware of what's happening. We're fighting harder. And more crucially, we are doing it with a smile on our faces. That's why I always want to remind you guys — Charlie always said to be a happy warrior. It makes a difference. It drives them insane. When you laugh at them, when they tell lies, you have to laugh at the lies that they are telling. Satan hates that, by the way. Satan hates being laughed at. That is the way that we have been winning so much. I really do believe that.